Contracts · MBE-tested
PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
396 U.S. 555·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 919.
Decided February 2, 1970
Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Deputy Solicitor General Springer, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Leonard S. Goodman for appellees the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.