Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Herman F. Koepke, as Committee of Claudius F. Bradley, an Incompetent Person, Respondent, v. Lucy A. Bradley et al., Defendants; Louis Dreyer, Purchaser, Appellant
151 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Herman F. Koepke, as Committee of Claudius F. Bradley, an Incompetent Person, Respondent, v. Lucy A. Bradley et al., Defendants; Louis Dreyer, Purchaser, Appellant.
Koepke v. Bradley, 3 A.pp. Div. 391, affirmed.
(Submitted October 19, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 6, 1896, which affirmed an order of the Special Term of the City Court of Brooklyn denying a motion by the appellant to relieve him from a purchase made at a sale under a judgment in an action for the partition of real estate.
Klein & Rendich for appellant.
Pickett & Quintard, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.