Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Christina Koeth, Respondent, v. Knights Templars and Masons' Life Indemnity Company, Appellant
169 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Christina Koeth, Respondent, v. Knights Templars and Masons’ Life Indemnity Company, Appellant.
Koeth v. Knights Templars & M. L. I. Bo., 43 App. Div. 624, affirmed.
(Argued January 13, 1902;
decided January 28, 1902.) .
Appeal from a judgment entered October 20,-1899, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department overruling defendant’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for the plaintiff upon a verdict.
Eugene Van VoorMs for appellant.
George F. Yeoman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.