Corporations
Dutch Trading Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Centennial Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Demex Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants
39 A.D.2d 691·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1972·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dutch Trading Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Centennial Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. Demex Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 26, 1971, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to produce certain persons and records for examination denied. The motion was made and granted pursuant to CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [1]: “ agent or employee of a party ”. The prospective witnesses were neither, but independent adjusters. This disposition is without prejudice to proper application under subdivision (4), which requires a showing of “adequate special circumstances.” Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.