General

Yesenia Garcia et al., Respondents, v. Lee Arrington et al., Appellants

282 A.D.2d 268722 N.Y.S.2d 868·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Yesenia Garcia et al., Respondents, v Lee Arrington et al., Appellants. [722 NYS2d 868] [MAJORITY] —Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered December 13, 1999, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs’ proof in opposition to this motion, which set forth specific findings regarding the existence and extent of plaintiffs’ spinal range of motion limitations, constituted objective evidence that plaintiffs had sustained serious injuries and, as such, were sufficient to raise a factual question respecting the seriousness of plaintiffs’ alleged injuries warranting denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment (see, Adetunji v U-Haul Co., 250 AD2d 483; DiLeo v Blumberg, 250 AD2d 364, 365; O’Sullivan v Atrium Bus Co., 246 AD2d 418,419). Concur — Andrias, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.