General
The Baylis Brothers Co. v. United States
62 Cust. Ct. 386·United States Customs Court·1969
Before Richardson, Landis, and Rosenstein, Judges
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(C.D. 3777)
The Baylis Brothers Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court, Third Division
(Decided April 14, 1969)
Bharretts, Paley, Carter, & Blauvelt for the plaintiff.
William D. Ruoleelshaus, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Before Richardson, Landis, and Rosenstein, Judges
[MAJORITY — Eichardson, Judge:]
Eichardson, Judge:
Defendant having moved for a dismissal of the protests in these cases on the ground of lack of prosecution and untimeliness upon the call of the calendar at San Juan, Puerto Eico, on February 18, 1969, and the court having granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for untimeliness, it is, therefore,
Oedeeed that the protests herein be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for untimeliness.