Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Heckers, Executive Director, Department of Revenue
414 U.S. 806·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73-249.
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Heckers, Executive Director, Department of Revenue.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Colo, dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas concurs, being of the view that a corporation is not a “person” within the meaning of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Glander, 337 U. S. 562, 576 (Douglas, J., dissenting).