Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
311 U.S. 27285 L. Ed. 183·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. PAN-AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
No. 264.
Argued November 19, 1940.
Decided December 9, 1940.
Mr. Arnold Raum, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Edward H. Horton were on the brief, for petitioner.
Mr. Eugene J. McGivhey for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Black]
Mr. Justice Black
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case involves respondent’s income tax for the tax year 1933. It is in all respects governed by our decision in Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life Ins. Co., ante, p. 267, and on the authority of that case the decision below is
Affirmed.