Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Caroline Traum et al.; Rosa Hermann et al., as Executors of Henry Hermann, Deceased, et al., Appellants; Annie M. Steuerwald, Respondent
158 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., and Bartlett, J., dissenting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Caroline Traum et al. Rosa Hermann et al., as Executors of Henry Hermann, Deceased, et al., Appellants; Annie M. Steuerwald, Respondent.
(Argued January 10, 1899;
decided January 24, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 31, 1898, modifying a final order of Special Term in surplus proceedings. •
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Traum, 26 App. Div. 532, affirmed.
William L. Mathot for appellants.
J. Stewart Ross for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., and Bartlett, J., dissenting.