Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Gary Steven JONES, a minor, by and through Lola Mae Jones, his guardian ad litem, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Allen F. BREED, Director of the California Youth Authority; Robert McKibben, Superintendent of the Southern Regional Center Clinic, California Youth Authority, Respondents-Appellees
519 F.2d 1314·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gary Steven JONES, a minor, by and through Lola Mae Jones, his guardian ad litem, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Allen F. BREED, Director of the California Youth Authority; Robert McKibben, Superintendent of the Southern Regional Center Clinic, California Youth Authority, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 72-2644.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 20, 1975.
Robert L. Walker (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
Russell Iungerich, Deputy Atty. Gen., California (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents-appellees.
Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge.
Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
In our decision, we reversed “with directions for the district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the state court, within 60 days, to vacate the adult conviction of Jones and either set him free or remand him to the juvenile court for disposition.” Jones v. Breed, 497 F.2d 1160, 1168 (9th Cir. 1974), aff’d, 421 U.S. 519, 95 S.Ct. 1779, 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975). The Supreme Court has now ordered that since “respondent is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the California Juvenile Court, we vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for such further proceedings consistent with this opinion as may be appropriate in the circumstances.” Breed v. Jones, 421 U.S. 519, 541, 95 S.Ct. 1779, 1791, 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975).
Therefore, we reverse and remand with directions for the district court to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the state court, within 60 days, to vacate the adult conviction of Jones and for such further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court as may be appropriate in the circumstances.