General
SHOTT v. OHIO
373 U.S. 240·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. .
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHOTT v. OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.
Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee..
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. .