Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Nathan ELLIOTT v. STATE of Arkansas
332 Ark. 615962 S.W.2d 815·Arkansas Supreme Court·1998·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nathan ELLIOTT v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 98-373
962 S.W.2d 815
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered April 16, 1998
Bruce J. Bennett, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appellant, Nathan Elliott, by his attorney, Bruce J. Bennett, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Bennett admits in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Accordingly, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Id.