IP
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. EISLER et al.
43 F.2d 319·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. EISLER et al.
No. 4074.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Sept. 5, 1930.
Merrell E. Clark, of New York City, for appellant.
Richard Eyre, of New York City, for ap>-p ellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court dismissing the bill filed in the above-stated cause on the ground that claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 14 of the Mitchell & White patent, No. 1,453,594, claim No. 7 of the Mitchell & White patent, No. 1,453,595, and claims 2 and 6 of the Marshall patent, No. 1,475,192, are invalid because of the lack of invention. We agree with the conclusions' of the learned District Judge, and affirm the decree on his opinion.
Affirmed.