Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Mather v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Testamentary Trust Under the Will of Mather et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
326 U.S. 767·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
MR. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 455.
No. 456.
Mather v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Testamentary Trust Under the Will of Mather et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
November 13, 1945.
Mr. John B. Putnam for petitioners.
Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Clark, Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch and Harold, C. Wilkenfeld for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Reported below: 149 F. 2d 393.
MR. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.