Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Washington Dredging & Improvement Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George Kinnear and Angie Kinnear, his Wife; John R. Kinnear and Leta Kinnear, his Wife, et al.
239 U.S. 632·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 115.
Washington Dredging & Improvement Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George Kinnear and Angie Kinnear, his Wife; John R. Kinnear and Leta Kinnear, his Wife, et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
Submitted Decernber 6, 1915.
Decided December 13, 1915.
Mr. W. F. Hays for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. George B. Cole, Mr. George E. de Steiguer and Mr. W. V. Tanner for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington, 231 U. S. 742; Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington, 235 U. S. 688.