General
Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc. et al.
348 U.S. 94099 L. Ed. 2d 736·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
February 14, 1955.
No. 80.
Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc. et al.
Argued February 8, 1955.
Decided February 14, 1955.
Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner.
With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles F. Barber, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins.
Edward Brodkey argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frank E. Gettleman and Arthur Gettleman.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The Court finds that the order of the Commission is not ambiguous. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, insofar as it modified paragraph 1 (c) of the Commission's order, is reversed and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to restore the order of the Commission.