General

Alta C. Brundige et al., Respondents, v. Dorothy C. Bradley et al., Individually and Claiming to be Trustees, Appellants, et al., Defendants

268 A.D. 952·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Alta C. Brundige et al., Respondents, v. Dorothy C. Bradley et al., Individually and Claiming to be Trustees, Appellants, et al., Defendants. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the judgment is contrary to law and contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to revoke a'trust.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and Larkin, JJ.