Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 of the Town of Cortlandt, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7 of the Town of Cortlandt, Respondent
176 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 of the Town of Cortlandt, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7 of the Town of Cortlandt, Respondent.
Reported below, 76 App. Div. 355.
(Argued October 5, 1903;
decided October 13, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 14, 1902, which reversed an order of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
D. 8. Herricli for.motion.
Elbert P. James opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars'costs.