Contracts · MBE-tested
Charles GREENBERG et al. v. CHECKER TAXI COMPANY
75 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles GREENBERG et al. v. CHECKER TAXI COMPANY.
No. 5088.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Feb. 28, 1935.
Julian C. Ryer and Charles A. Williams, both of Chicago, 111., for appellants.
Samuel A. Ettelson, Edward C. Higgins, and L. A. Stebbins, all of Chicago, 111., for appellee.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ-IfENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Charles Greenberg and Nathan Rubenstein, Appellants in this cause, by Juliap C. Ryer and Charles A. Williams, their attorneys, and Checker Taxi Company, a corporation, Appellee, by Samuel A. Ettelson, Edward C. Higgins and L. A. Stebbins, its attorneys, that, subject to the approval of the Court, an order may be entered in this cause dismissing the appeal.”
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation. It is further ordered that the costs on this appeal be taxed against the appellants.