Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
McGee, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al. v. Ekberg
343 U.S. 970·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 517.
McGee, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al. v. Ekberg.
Argued April 28, 1952.
Decided June 9, 1952.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot.
Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General. Allan L. Sapiro argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.