Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other persons who have been denied pension payments from the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund et al., Appellants, v. W. A. BOYLE et al.
517 F.2d 1274·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1974
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other persons who have been denied pension payments from the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund et al., Appellants, v. W. A. BOYLE et al.
No. 73-2197.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 17, 1974.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVEN-THAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
It is ordered by the Court en banc, sua sponte, that the above entitled case shall be reargued before the Court sitting en banc at 2:00 P.M., Wednesday, October 23, 1974, along with appeal numbers 73— 1393—Kiser, et al. v. Huge, et al., and 73—1270—Pete, et al., v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, et al., 170 U.S.App. D.C. -, 517 F.2d. 1274.