Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Bradley & Currier Company, Appellant, v. Jacques Pacheteau, Respondent
175 N.Y. 492·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bradley & Currier Company, Appellant, v. Jacques Pacheteau, Respondent.
Bradley & Carrier Co. v. Pacheteau, 71 App. Div. 148, reversed.
(Submitted May 18, 1903;
decided June 2, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 23, 1902, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and dismissing the complaint.
Austin E. Pressinger and Edgar Whitlock for appellant.
Abraham Levy and Henry W. Unger for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order reversed and judgment of Sjiecial Term so modified" as to award a pei’sonal judgment 'only, pursuant to section 3412 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and as thus modified affirmed as of November 9, 1901, without costs in this court or in the Appellate Division to either party ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ,