Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
IP
Virgil E. DUEMLER and George R. Koeln, Appellants, v. Ira E. McCABE, Appellee
69 F.2d 1003·United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virgil E. DUEMLER and George R. Koeln, Appellants, v. Ira E. McCABE, Appellee.
No. 3167.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
March 19, 1934.
For former opinion, see 67 F. (2d) 911.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A petition for rehearing has been filed heroin in which it is alleged that certain misstatements of fact were made in our opinion filed December 30, 1933. While it appears, on re-examination of the matter, that certain inaccuracies of expression occur therein, these do not in any way affect the merits, or the correctness of the conclusion originally reached by us. Tbe petition for rehearing is therefore denied.