Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Local 300, United Industrial Workers of America, Seafarers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO v. Marriott In-Flite Services Division of Marriott Corp.
397 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1039.
Local 300, United Industrial Workers of America, Seafarers International Union of North America, AFL-CIO v. Marriott In-Flite Services Division of Marriott Corp.
Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, and Howard Schulman for petitioner. John T. Weise and R. Theodore Clark, Jr., for respondent. Solicitor General Griswold and Arnold Ordman filed a memorandum for National Labor Relations Board in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.