Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bankruptcy
BRADY v. BERNARD & KITTINGER
217 U.S. 595·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BRADY v. BERNARD & KITTINGER.
APPEAL- FROM, ANO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO, THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 501.
Petition for certiorari and motion to dismiss submitted April 26, 1910
Decided May 2, 1910.
An appeal from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under §‘25a of the Bankruptcy Aci oí 1.198 dismissed because taken too late.
Appeal from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under § 25a of the Bankruptcy Act.
Appellee contended in this case that the appeal came too late as it was taken more than ten days after the order. Appellant contended that as he had filed a petition to set aside the order the time ran from denial of that order. The petition to set aside was not filed until more than ten days after the adjudication.
Mr. Norman Farrell, Jr., and Mr. Hill McAlister for appellants.
Mr. Edwin C. Brandenburg, Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg, Mr. F. Walter Brandenburg, Mr. A. E. Wilson and Mr. James R. Duffin for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and petition for writ of certiorari denied.