Administrative
Royal Trading Company, Limited, and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/8864, etc. (Honolulu); Fijiya, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 64/14346, etc. (Honolulu)
57 Cust. Ct. 806·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
August 24, 1966
No. P66/207. —
No. P66/208. —
Royal Trading Company, Limited, and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 61/8864, etc. (Honolulu). Fijiya, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 64/14346, etc. (Honolulu).
[MAJORITY — Donlon, J.]
Donlon, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al. v. United Stales (52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.