General
Constance Lipkin et al., Appellants, v. Murray Zeigler, Doing Business as Alfred Maurice Hairdressers et al., Respondents
17 A.D.2d 972·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1962·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Constance Lipkin et al., Appellants, v. Murray Zeigler, Doing Business as Alfred Maurice Hairdressers et al., Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Motions by respondent Clairol, Inc., in which respondent Zeigler joins, to dismiss appeals granted; appeals dismissed. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., not voting.