General
In the Matter of Thomas Hart et al., Respondents, v. City of Plattsburgh Zoning Board of Appeals et al., Appellants
100 A.D.2d 709·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1984·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Thomas Hart et al., Respondents, v City of Plattsburgh Zoning Board of Appeals et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Viscardi, J.), entered March 4, 1983 in Clinton County, which granted petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a use variance granted by the City of Plattsburgh Zoning Board of Appeals. K Judgment affirmed, without costs, upon the opinion of Justice Dominick J. Viscardi at Special Term. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.