General
Marie Y. Bruno, Respondent, v. Albert Einstein College of Medicine et al., Defendants, and Morton Finkel, Appellant
191 A.D.2d 352595 N.Y.S.2d 405·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1993·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marie Y. Bruno, Respondent, v Albert Einstein College of Medicine et al., Defendants, and Morton Finkel, Appellant.
[595 NYS2d 405]
[MAJORITY]
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.), entered June 25, 1991, which denied defendant-appellant Finkel’s motion to renew and reargue, unanimously affirmed without costs.
Since the angiogram procedure was initiated upon appellant’s recommendation assertedly without disclosing the risks thereof, and the fact that appellant’s associate admitted plaintiff to defendant hospital and ordered the test raise issues of fact as to appellant’s liability for the alleged acts of malpractice. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.