Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co. et al.
352 U.S. 964·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 525.
United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co. et al.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Melvin Richter for the United States. Edward W. Bourne, Eugene Z. Du Bose and Edward E. Rigney for the Homestake Mining Co;’ Phillip Barnett and Ralph D. Pittman for the Central Eureka Mining Co., O. R. McGuire, Jr. for the Alaska-Pacific Consolidated Mining Co., George Herrington and William H. Orrick, Jr. for the Idaho Maryland Mines Corporation, and Samuel Green, John W. Cutler and John D. Costello for the Bald Mountain Mining Co. et ah, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Court of . Claims. Certiorari granted.