Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Carlson et al. v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service; and Butterfield, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Zydok
343 U.S. 988·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, Mr. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Minton dissent from the order granting the stay.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 35.
No. 136.
Carlson et al. v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service; and Butterfield, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Zydok.
[MAJORITY]
342 U. S. 524. Petition for rehearing denied. The motion of petitioner Carlson to stay issuance of the mandate, insofar as applicable to him, pending his trial in United States v. Schneiderman et al., is granted to permit his attendance at his trial which is now in progress in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. This stay will be automatically dissolved when Carlson’s case is submitted to the jury or when it is finally decided by the trial court, whichever is the sooner.
Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, Mr. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Minton dissent from the order granting the stay.