Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER CO.
52 F.2d 145·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER CO.
No. 5919.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 25, 1931.
See, also, 51 F.(2d) 665.
Stafford Caldwell, of Jacksonville, Fla., and John W. Davis and Charles Caldwell, both of New York City, for appellant.
George C. Bedell, Robt. R. Milam, and A. Y. Milam, all of Jacksonville, Fla., and E. T. Mcllvaine, of Miami, Ela., for appellee.
Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appellee, having joined in the stipulation stating the portions of the record to be included in the record on appeal, is not in position to claim that any part of it should not have been included.
The motion to retax the costs upon the record is denied.