Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Elliott et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.; and Ross v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.
390 U.S. 1011·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1118.
No. 1119.
Elliott et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.; and Ross v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.
Charles K. Chapman for petitioner Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Assn., and George W. Trammell for petitioner Shareholders’ Protective Committee in No. 1118. Harvey M. Grossman for petitioner in No. 1119. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Carl Eardley, John C. Eldridge, Leonard Schaitman and Alan J. Moscov for respondents Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al., and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Arthur C. de Goede and David W. Halpin, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent Savings and Loan Commissioner, in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 386 F. 2d 42.