Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
371 U.S. 6·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 247.
Decided October 8, 1962.
Albert B. Russ, Jr., C. Baxter Jones, Herman Heyman, W. L. Grubbs, Prime F. Osborn and Homer S. Carpenter for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
Charles J. Bloch, Henry J. Karison and R. Granville Curry for appellee carriers.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.