General
STURDIVANT v. MEMPHIS NAT. BANK
60 F. 736·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1894
Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
STURDIVANT v. MEMPHIS NAT. BANK.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 27, 1894.)
No. 171.
In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for thé Northern District of Mississippi. .
E. Mayes, for plaintiff in error.
W. V. Sullivan, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and McCORMICK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PARDEE, Circuit Judge.]
PARDEE, Circuit Judge.
This case is, in all respects, identical with the case of Sturdivant v. Bank (No. 170; just decided), GO Fed. 730, and is to be ruled the same way. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case remanded, with instructions to reinstate the fourth plea, award a new trial, and otherwise proceed according to the views announced by this court.