General
Ex parte ARDJEN SINGH, on Habeas Corpus. ARDJEN SINGH v. WHITE, Commissioner of Immigration for Port of San Francisco
267 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1920
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ex parte ARDJEN SINGH, on Habeas Corpus. ARDJEN SINGH v. WHITE, Commissioner of Immigration for Port of San Francisco.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
November 1, 1920.)
No. 3592.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California.
Frank M. Silva, U. S. Atty., and Ben. F. Geis, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed for noncompliance by appellant with provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice (208 Fed. ix, 124 C. C. A. ix).