Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Acuff et al. v. United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, et al.
394 U.S. 987·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1095.
Acuff et al. v. United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, et al.
Reber Boult, Jr., Charles Morgan, Jr., Melvin L. Wulf, and Eleanor Holmes Norton for petitioners.
Warren Woods, Betty Southard Murphy, Benjamin Wyle, and Willis C. Darby, Jr., for United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, et al., and T. K. Jackson, Jr., for Scott Paper Co., Southern Division, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.