General
George F. Comstock, Appellant and Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse et al., Appellants and Respondents; William A. Sweet, Appellant and Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse et al., Respondents and Appellants
128 N.Y. 680·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George F. Comstock, Appellant and Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse et al., Appellants and Respondents. William A. Sweet, Appellant and Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse et al., Respondents and Appellants.
(Submitted October 19, 1891;
decided October 27, 1891.)
Motions for reargnment.
George F. Comstock and Charles H. Peck for motions.
Charles L. Stone and Willam A. Beach opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motions; no opinion. .
All concur.
Motions granted.