Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
FARMERS' AND TRADERS' BANK OF OWENSBORO v. OWENSBORO
173 U.S. 66343 L. Ed. 850·Supreme Court of the United States·1899
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FARMERS’ AND TRADERS’ BANK OF OWENSBORO v. OWENSBORO.
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
No. 151.
Argued February 27, 28, 1899.
Decided April 3, 1899.
Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, ante, 636, followed.
This case was argued with the Citizens' Savings Bank case.
Mr. W. T. Ellis for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Chapeze Wathen and Mr. J. D. Atchison for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice White]
Mr. Justice White
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error was chartered by the legislature of Kentucky in 1876. The charter limited - the taxing power to fifty cents on each one hundred dollars of capital stock, during the life of the corporation, which was fixed at twenty-five years. This suit was commenced by petition asserting the .nullity of certain taxes levied by the city of Owensboro for the years 1893 and 1894. The petition was twice amended. The cause of action alleged was, in every material respect, the same as that relied on in the case of Citizens’ Savings Bank of Owensboro v. Owensboro, No. 669, ante, 636. For this reason the opinion in that case disposes of all the issues arising in this, and for the reasons therein given the decree of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky in this case rendered is
Affirmed.