Contracts · MBE-tested
Van Hoomissen et al. v. Hayse et al.
403 U.S. 927·Supreme Court of the United States·1971
Mr. Justice Douglas, is of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1387.
Van Hoomissen et al. v. Hayse et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Ore. Judgment' vacated and case remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37; and Samuels v. Mackell, and Fernandez v. Mackell, 401 U. S. 66.
Mr. Justice Douglas, is of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.