Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. et al.
382 U.S. 19715 L. Ed. 2d 268·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. et al.
No. 8.
Argued November 15, 1965.
Decided December 6, 1965.
Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Frank Goodman and Robert B. Hummel.
Dennis G. Lyons and Thomas W. Pomeroy, Jr., argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were Paul A. Porter, William L. McGovern, John A. Blair, S. K. McCune and W. Walter Braham, Jr.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.