Wellford v. Miller

Wellford v. Miller A copy will not be received as oyer, when a proferí has been made of the original. And if a copy is offered, the defendant may demur. Debt on a bond, with proferí of the original bond. The defendant demanded oyer, and the plaintiff produced a supposed copy only, it being said that the original was in the possession of the defendant; whereupon the defendant demurred because the profert was of the original, and the oyer was of a supposed copy. Mr. C. Lee,' for the defendant, cited Thoresby v. Sparrow, 1 Wils. 16 ; Smith v. Woodioard, 4 East, 587. Mr. Youngs, contra. The plaintiff could not have declared upon it as a bond lost or mislaid, and when he drew the declaration he supposed that the defendant would be compelled to produce it, so as to enable him to give oyer. Read v. Brookman, 3 T. R. 151. In Darlington v. Groverman, this Court compelled the defendant to receive a copy as oyer. [MAJORITY — Fitzhugh, J.] Fitzhugh, J. That was under the Act of Assembly of Virginia, the bond being filed in another court. The CouRT stopped Mr. Lee in reply, and adjudged the demurrer to be good. The fact that the bond was in the defendant’s possession did not appear upon the record.