General
Stevens Voisin, Plaintiff, v. The Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Company, Respondent. George Freifeld, as Receiver of Stevens Voisin, Appellant; Mitchell & Mitchell, Respondent
176 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stevens Voisin, Plaintiff, v. The Thames and Mersey Marine Insurance Company, Respondent. George Freifeld, as Receiver of Stevens Voisin, Appellant; Mitchell & Mitchell, Respondent.
Voisin v. Thames & Mersey M. Ins. Co., 84 App. Div: 643, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 9, 1903;
decided October 30, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the'first judicial department, entered June 29, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to vacate and set aside an order of discontinuance.
II. A. Vieu and A. II. Barl&lmrst for appellant.
C. B. Bovee, Jr., and Wilhelmxts Mynclerse for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed,-with costs; no opinion.
Concur: O’Bbien, Baetlett, Maktin, Vann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ. Absent: Pabkeb, Ch. J.