Administrative
Henry A. Wess, Inc. (Queen City Wreath Co.) v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 615·United States Customs Court·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(Reap. Dec. 9636)
Henry A. Wess, Inc. (Queen City Wreath Co.) v. United States
Entry Nos. 577; 664.
(Decided March 22, 1960)
Tompkins & Tompkins for the plaintiff.
George Cochran Douh, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Oliver, Chief Judge:]
Oliver, Chief Judge:
These two appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise enumerated on the invoices from Fuku-shima Celluloid Works, Ltd., Japan.
Stipulated facts, upon which the appeals for reappraisement are before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the invoice unit prices, net, packed, and I so hold.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.