Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. McElroy et al.; and Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis v. McElroy et al.
393 U.S. 1015·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81.
No. 128.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. McElroy et al.; and Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis v. McElroy et al.
Harold A. Boss and John H. Haley, Jr., for petitioner in No. 81 and for respondent Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers in No. 128. James A. Wilcox for petitioner in No. 128. Charles B. Judge for respondents McElroy et al. in both cases.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Peter L. Strauss, and John C. Eldridge filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, by invitation of the Court, ante, p. 813, in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.