General
Caleb E. Whitaker, Respondent, v. Imperial Skirt Manufacturing Company, Appellant
94 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Caleb E. Whitaker, Respondent, v. Imperial Skirt Manufacturing Company, Appellant.
(Argued December 12, 1883;
decided January 15, 1884.)
The principal questions presented were upon exception to findings of fact.
The court say: “We find no question of law improperly decided, nor any finding of fact unsupported by evidence. In such a case we have only to affirm the judgment. (Code, §§ 1337, 1338; Reynolds v. Robinson, 82 N. Y. 103; 37 Am. Rep. 555.)”
Flamen B. Candler for appellant.
George V. N. Baldwin for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Danforth, J.,]
Danforth, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.