General
B. MILANO, Respondent, v. F. RATTO et al., Appellants
125 Cal. App. 784·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1932·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 8415.
First Appellate District, Division Two.
July 25, 1932.]
B. MILANO, Respondent, v. F. RATTO et al., Appellants.
George R. Perkins for Appellants.
W. H. Clay for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — SPENCE, J.]
SPENCE, J.
This is a companion case to Milano v. Bulleri, (No. 8414) ante, p. 72 [13 Pac. (2d) 521], in which the opinion was this day filed. The appellant owners in the present case defaulted in the trial court and a judgment decreeing foreclosure of the lien was entered. The appeal in this case is submitted upon the briefs in Milano v. Bulleri. For the reasons stated in thé opinion in said last-named case, the appeal herein is dismissed.
Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.