Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. Sturgis Milling Company; A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. The Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad Company; A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. T. W. Calloway et al.
220 U.S. 610·Supreme Court of the United States·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 893.
A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. Sturgis Milling Company; A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. The Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad Company; A. J. Preston, Petitioner, v. T. W. Calloway et al.
No. 894.
and No. 895.
February 27, 1911.
Mr. Helm Bruce and Mr. Kennedy Helm for the petitioner.
Mr. James F.
Fairleigh for the respondents in Nos. 893 and 895.
Mr. Edmund F. Trabue, Mr. John C. Doolan, Mr. Attila Cox, Jr., and Mr. Blewett Lee for the respondent in No. 894.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.