Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Hewitt Boice, Respondent, v. The Municipal Telegraph and Stock Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hewitt Boice, Respondent, v. The Municipal Telegraph and Stock Company, Appellant.
Boice v. Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co., 117 App. Div. 914, affirmed.
(Argued April 10, 1908;
decided April 24, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division 'of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 22, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover certain sums of money paid as margins on the purchase and sale of certain shares of stock.
D. Cady Herrick and John A. Delehanty for appellant.
John G. Van Etten and John A. Stephens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.