Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Clemens Herold et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph Frank et al.
191 U.S. 558·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 55.
Clemens Herold et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph Frank et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Cu-riam.]
In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State, of New Jersey.
Argued and submitted November 4, 1903.
Decided November 9, 1903.
Mr. James G, Blauvelt for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. John W. Harding for defendants in error.
Per Cu-riam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Oxley Stave Company v, Butler County, 166 U. S. 648; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127; Capital City Dairy Company v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291; McKane v. Durston, 153 U. S. 684.